Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Britt
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:59, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nathaniel Britt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR. OSborn arfcontribs. 04:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. OSborn arfcontribs. 04:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm. Why so? He seems to meet criteria no.1 which states:
- Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.
- Arxquefyga (talk) 08:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm. Why so? He seems to meet criteria no.1 which states:
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- All the parts listed on the page appear to me to be minor parts, not significant roles. He may be a somewhat recurrent actor on some of those shows but I'm not sure that counts at significant roles. OSborn arfcontribs. 01:54, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Some of those roles listed are actually significant roles. Arxquefyga (talk) 04:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:20, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.